<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Coffee and Markets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coffeeandmarkets.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coffeeandmarkets.com</link>
	<description>Podcasts on politics, culture, and the marketplace</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Catholics Sue to Stop HHS Birth Control Mandate by tim gildersleeve</title>
		<link>http://coffeeandmarkets.com/2012/05/22/catholics-sue-to-stop-hhs-birth-control-mandate/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>tim gildersleeve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coffeeandmarkets.com/?p=35617#comment-682</guid>
		<description>download is broken and has the wrong date. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>download is broken and has the wrong date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jonah Goldberg Discusses The Tyranny of Cliches by Eric Williamson</title>
		<link>http://coffeeandmarkets.com/2012/05/09/jonah-goldberg-discusses-the-tyranny-of-cliches/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coffeeandmarkets.com/?p=35586#comment-679</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if its just me, but my podcast aggregator (Pocket Casts) is showing Apr 25 as the last episode available and has for quite some time.  I&#039;ve uninstalled and reinstalled and the same thing.  All other podcasts are updating as normal so I think it might be a problem on y&#039;all&#039;s end.  Just wanted to let you know.  I miss the show!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if its just me, but my podcast aggregator (Pocket Casts) is showing Apr 25 as the last episode available and has for quite some time.  I&#8217;ve uninstalled and reinstalled and the same thing.  All other podcasts are updating as normal so I think it might be a problem on y&#8217;all&#8217;s end.  Just wanted to let you know.  I miss the show!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Josh Zerkle Talks NFL Draft and the Scandals Plaguing the New Orleans Saints by Bob</title>
		<link>http://coffeeandmarkets.com/2012/05/01/josh-zerkle-talks-nfl-draft-and-the-scandals-plaguing-the-new-orleans-saints/#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 15:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coffeeandmarkets.com/?p=35568#comment-677</guid>
		<description>Baylor QBs:  Adrian Burke drafted #2 in the first round, 1950 by the Colts. 
 Cotton Davidson, 1st round, #5 by ....the Colts.   

also drafted:
Buddy Humphrey 2/16/1959/Rams
Cody Carlson 3/64/67 Oilers
Don Troll - TWICE!  14/111/Oilers and 9/117/Colts, 1963
Joe Reed 11/283/1971 49ers
Neal Jeffrey 17/423/1975 Chargers

and let&#039;s not forget undrafted Brad Goebel who played seven games for the Eagles and Brows in the early 90&#039;s

source:  pro-football-reference.com
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baylor QBs:  Adrian Burke drafted #2 in the first round, 1950 by the Colts.<br />
 Cotton Davidson, 1st round, #5 by &#8230;.the Colts.   </p>
<p>also drafted:<br />
Buddy Humphrey 2/16/1959/Rams<br />
Cody Carlson 3/64/67 Oilers<br />
Don Troll &#8211; TWICE!  14/111/Oilers and 9/117/Colts, 1963<br />
Joe Reed 11/283/1971 49ers<br />
Neal Jeffrey 17/423/1975 Chargers</p>
<p>and let&#8217;s not forget undrafted Brad Goebel who played seven games for the Eagles and Brows in the early 90&#8242;s</p>
<p>source:  pro-football-reference.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Crowdfunding the Future of Small Business Investing? by Michael Fisk</title>
		<link>http://coffeeandmarkets.com/2012/04/23/is-crowdfunding-the-future-of-small-business-investing/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Fisk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 06:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coffeeandmarkets.com/?p=35549#comment-672</guid>
		<description>I think where Francis really has a hard time grasping the nature of where crowdfunding has its role is in largely consumer-oriented businesses, especially in niche markets... VC typically hasn&#039;t been good on the consumer goods side of things, and to think that venture capital has the ability to understand niche markets enough to fund them is nothing short of hubris.

While Francis might think that having VC manage this sort of funding protects individual investors, but I&#039;d point out two shortcomings to that.  One is the nature of crowdsourced funding allows many sets of eyes to look over what&#039;s going on - if something is amiss, there&#039;s more chances to catch it, even from a small army of rank amateurs, than there is among professionals.  Secondly, while the professionals may insulate the general investor from the sort of catastrophic losses that venture capital often suffers, the current system also pretty well blocks common investors from realizing the gains that early capital rounds to a promising startup can realize.  How fair is that, to say &quot;only the pros can hit the jackpot&quot;?

(Fair disclosure: I&#039;ve backed close to a dozen projects on Kickstarter, some of which completed literally days after the funding run ended, others I won&#039;t see the fruits of the projects until late next year, but have done quite a bit of reading up on various projects as a result.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think where Francis really has a hard time grasping the nature of where crowdfunding has its role is in largely consumer-oriented businesses, especially in niche markets&#8230; VC typically hasn&#8217;t been good on the consumer goods side of things, and to think that venture capital has the ability to understand niche markets enough to fund them is nothing short of hubris.</p>
<p>While Francis might think that having VC manage this sort of funding protects individual investors, but I&#8217;d point out two shortcomings to that.  One is the nature of crowdsourced funding allows many sets of eyes to look over what&#8217;s going on &#8211; if something is amiss, there&#8217;s more chances to catch it, even from a small army of rank amateurs, than there is among professionals.  Secondly, while the professionals may insulate the general investor from the sort of catastrophic losses that venture capital often suffers, the current system also pretty well blocks common investors from realizing the gains that early capital rounds to a promising startup can realize.  How fair is that, to say &#8220;only the pros can hit the jackpot&#8221;?</p>
<p>(Fair disclosure: I&#8217;ve backed close to a dozen projects on Kickstarter, some of which completed literally days after the funding run ended, others I won&#8217;t see the fruits of the projects until late next year, but have done quite a bit of reading up on various projects as a result.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Crowdfunding the Future of Small Business Investing? by NormD</title>
		<link>http://coffeeandmarkets.com/2012/04/23/is-crowdfunding-the-future-of-small-business-investing/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>NormD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coffeeandmarkets.com/?p=35549#comment-671</guid>
		<description>Where to start.

VCs fund something like 1 out of 1000 deals.  Where are other startups supposed to go?

I talked with a rep from Band of Angels.  I asked if they ever funded companies based on other than a financial basis.  He thought and told me that reminded him of a pitch that was made at a Band of Angels dinner by a guy how had invented a unit that used radar to detect the metal in a suicide bomb vest and thus could pick a suicide bomber out of a crowd.  I said, Wow, what a great idea, did he get funded?  Answer:  Nope, the natural buyers for such a unit is government and it takes too long to sell to them.  The financials did not make sense.  Saving people&#039;s lives has no payback.

What Francis is supporting is putting people in JAIL, for felonies, for a long time, for the crime of asking people to invest in their idea.  IT IS EVIL.

If Francis has spent any time in the VC community he should know that VCs are always looking for he BIG deal.  If you have an idea for a small business, even a high tech profitable business that will earn $5M-$10M per year., VCs have no interest.

10 years ago I worked for a startup that had a system that paid medical bills based on cases not fee-for-service.  We were looking for $5M.  VCs had no interest because that was not a large enough amount for them to put a person on our BoD.

If Francis has any consistency he will also have to support outlawing gambling, lotteries, medical care not approved by &quot;experts&quot;, cars driven by &quot;non-experts&quot; (only taxis will be allowed), cooking at home (you could poison yourself), non-expert parents raising children, the list goes on-and-on.

Lastly, it would seem like in this Internet Age that it would easier to find out about scammers that in the 1930s

Francis is simply rent-seeking...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where to start.</p>
<p>VCs fund something like 1 out of 1000 deals.  Where are other startups supposed to go?</p>
<p>I talked with a rep from Band of Angels.  I asked if they ever funded companies based on other than a financial basis.  He thought and told me that reminded him of a pitch that was made at a Band of Angels dinner by a guy how had invented a unit that used radar to detect the metal in a suicide bomb vest and thus could pick a suicide bomber out of a crowd.  I said, Wow, what a great idea, did he get funded?  Answer:  Nope, the natural buyers for such a unit is government and it takes too long to sell to them.  The financials did not make sense.  Saving people&#8217;s lives has no payback.</p>
<p>What Francis is supporting is putting people in JAIL, for felonies, for a long time, for the crime of asking people to invest in their idea.  IT IS EVIL.</p>
<p>If Francis has spent any time in the VC community he should know that VCs are always looking for he BIG deal.  If you have an idea for a small business, even a high tech profitable business that will earn $5M-$10M per year., VCs have no interest.</p>
<p>10 years ago I worked for a startup that had a system that paid medical bills based on cases not fee-for-service.  We were looking for $5M.  VCs had no interest because that was not a large enough amount for them to put a person on our BoD.</p>
<p>If Francis has any consistency he will also have to support outlawing gambling, lotteries, medical care not approved by &#8220;experts&#8221;, cars driven by &#8220;non-experts&#8221; (only taxis will be allowed), cooking at home (you could poison yourself), non-expert parents raising children, the list goes on-and-on.</p>
<p>Lastly, it would seem like in this Internet Age that it would easier to find out about scammers that in the 1930s</p>
<p>Francis is simply rent-seeking&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jim Capretta Discuss Don Berwick and a Premium Support System by Ex-Obama Medicare Chief Don Berwick: Consumer-Driven Health Care a 'Vicious Idea' - Forbes</title>
		<link>http://coffeeandmarkets.com/2012/04/12/jim-capretta-discuss-don-berwick-and-a-premium-support-system/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>Ex-Obama Medicare Chief Don Berwick: Consumer-Driven Health Care a 'Vicious Idea' - Forbes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coffeeandmarkets.com/?p=35529#comment-669</guid>
		<description>[...] Coffee &amp; Markets interviews Jim Capretta, who shared the stage with Berwick at the Pioneer Institute, regarding Berwick&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Coffee &amp; Markets interviews Jim Capretta, who shared the stage with Berwick at the Pioneer Institute, regarding Berwick&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not a Good Jobs Report on Good Friday by What is the New Normal for Unemployment? &#187; Coffee and Markets</title>
		<link>http://coffeeandmarkets.com/2012/04/06/not-a-good-jobs-report-on-good-friday/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>What is the New Normal for Unemployment? &#187; Coffee and Markets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coffeeandmarkets.com/?p=35516#comment-665</guid>
		<description>[...] &#171;     &#169; 2012 Brad Jackson. All rights reserved. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &laquo;     &copy; 2012 Brad Jackson. All rights reserved. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Marco Rubio Still Winning the Veepstakes? by onceproudamerican</title>
		<link>http://coffeeandmarkets.com/2012/04/05/is-marco-rubio-still-in-winning-the-veepstakes/#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator>onceproudamerican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 02:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coffeeandmarkets.com/?p=35513#comment-663</guid>
		<description>Minor v Happersett, a 9-0 ruling, says that Rubio isn&#039;t eligible... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minor v Happersett, a 9-0 ruling, says that Rubio isn&#8217;t eligible&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ken Cuccinelli Discusses Obamacare at the Supreme Court by Mitt Romney Meets Jim Pethokoukis</title>
		<link>http://coffeeandmarkets.com/2012/03/29/ken-cuccinelli-discusses-obamacare-at-the-supreme-court/#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitt Romney Meets Jim Pethokoukis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 22:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coffeeandmarkets.com/?p=35497#comment-662</guid>
		<description>[...] speaks! My Q&amp;A with Republican presidential front-runner Mitt Romney Ken Cuccinelli Discusses Obamacare at the Supreme Court Ben and Brad Talk Obamacare at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] speaks! My Q&amp;A with Republican presidential front-runner Mitt Romney Ken Cuccinelli Discusses Obamacare at the Supreme Court Ben and Brad Talk Obamacare at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ken Cuccinelli Discusses Obamacare at the Supreme Court by Mitt Romney Meets Jim Pethokoukis &#124; Tea Party Base</title>
		<link>http://coffeeandmarkets.com/2012/03/29/ken-cuccinelli-discusses-obamacare-at-the-supreme-court/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitt Romney Meets Jim Pethokoukis &#124; Tea Party Base</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coffeeandmarkets.com/?p=35497#comment-661</guid>
		<description>[...] speaks! My Q&amp;A with Republican presidential front-runner Mitt Romney Ken Cuccinelli Discusses Obamacare at the Supreme Court Ben and Brad Talk Obamacare at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] speaks! My Q&amp;A with Republican presidential front-runner Mitt Romney Ken Cuccinelli Discusses Obamacare at the Supreme Court Ben and Brad Talk Obamacare at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

